Are the F5 and F55 going to be game-changers?

PMW-F55 fully configured.

I was going to call this: “There’s never been a better time to buy a camera”, but then the more I thought about it the more I realised that actually in some respects, right now it’s really difficult to make the right camera choice due to the large number of very capable cameras on the market. At one extreme you have the Black Magic Cinema camera offering raw HD for just $3K and at the other end there is the Sony F65 with it’s 8k sensor and 16 bit raw high speed recording. Confusing the issue is the fact that both the $3K BMCC and the $100K F65 both shoot raw, what is it that makes a $97,000 difference between these cameras? Obviously there are many differences, but even so, will the audience be able to tell in the finished film, in a lot of cases perhaps not?

So what your paying for is after sales support, ergonomics, reliability and usability. This is where I think the F5 and F55 may be game changers. If Sony have put together these camera packages as well as it appears, then it looks like the F5 and F55 tick all the right boxes. Lets look at each of those 4 factors in more detail.

After Sales Support: Sony has a world wide network of repair and service centres. While not always cheap, if you need support you can get it almost anywhere in the world. The Sony ICE program (of which I am a member) is being expanded, the idea is that experienced and competent users will be able to help new users with getting the most from their equipment. This is often in the form of free workshops and seminars. This allows users to get up to speed fast, to avoid costly mistakes and to maximise on their investment.

The LCD control panel on the side of the F5/F55

Ergonomics:The PMW-F5 and PMW-F55 are evolutions of the PMW-F3, but gone is the now common place integral LCD monitor, replaced instead by a large clear multi function LCD control panel surrounded by 6 large buttons whose functions change depending on the mode you are in. The LCD menu panel is on the camera operators side of the camera. There are 4 modes, Camera, File, Timecode and View. In Camera mode these give you control over frame rate, shutter speed, colour temperature, exposure index or gain, gamma and look up tables. These really are the 6 key camera functions that you need rapid access to when shooting and the corresponding setting are clearly displayed on the LCD screen. There are perhaps fewer assignable buttons (4) than on previous cameras but this helps keep the camera un-cluttered. The built in ND filters (3 stop and 6 stop) are controlled via a rotary knob which I much prefer over the slide switches on some other cameras.

BNC HDSDI and XLR audio modules on the F55

On the other side of the camera body are all the connectors. Sony have been quite clever here in that they have made the XLR connectors and timecode connectors removable. While most users will probably never remove these connector modules what it does do is allow them to be taken off for 3D applications where camera width can be critical. The cameras also feature spare 12 volt 1.8 amp power outputs for accessories. Although the camera body is very box like which may not at first glance appear very ergonomic there is a shoulder mount system complete with arri rosettes designed specifically for the cameras along with a detachable top handle. The top handle on it’s front has the very same viewfinder mount as found on almost every Sony shoulder mount camera.

The F5/F55’s modular make-up.

On to this mount you can attach one of three viewfinders. The entry level viewfinder is a 3.5″ LCD finder very similar to the viewfinder used on the PMW-350 or PMW-500. The DVF-L350 3.5-inch LCD viewfinder has a new high resolution 960 x 540 LCD panel with better contrast than previous panels. The resolution is exactly half full HD (interestingly this is a remarkably similar spec to the new Alphatron and Cineroid EVF’s). There is also a very nice sounding the DVF-EL100 OLED EVF. This 0.7-inch viewfinder is 1280 x 720 resolution and will have the lovely true blacks that only OLED or CRT offers. If you want a big viewfinder then there is the DVF-L700 compact 7-inch ultra high resolution LCD view finder which gives pixel-for-pixel 1920 x 1080 HD images and is really aimed at those shooting 2K and 4K.

Adding either the DVF-L350 or DVF-EL100 along with the shoulder mount will turn the PMW-F5 or F55 into a true shoulder mount camera, designed to be shoulder mounted from day one, no dodgy lashed together rigs needed with these cameras. Of course your not tied to a Sony viewfinder. The HDMI out as well as one pair of the 4 HDSDI outputs can be set to carry the cameras overlays and menu information, so you should be able to use almost any viewfinder you want.

So, ergonomically it looks like Sony really have got it right. Not too big, not too small, shoulder mount or handheld, big buttons for the primary functions and a clear multifunction display.

Reliability: These are Sony cameras. Both the F5 and F55 share the same body and I suspect most of the innards are the same (we do know the sensors are different). As the PMW-F55 is going to be a mid range model, it should come with the kind of reliability that you get with cameras like the PMW-500 or PDW-700, cameras that are workhorses of the broadcast world. One issue that can sometimes let the F3 down is dust sealing around the ND filter slide switch. Hopefully the new rotary knob for the ND filters will eliminate this issue. I fully expect these to be solid, reliable cameras with high quality connectors etc that will withstand the rigours of life on location.

Usability: There is some cross-over here with ergonomics, which I’ve already covered but the F5 and PMW-F55 have some great features that make them really flexible and versatile. They use the same lens mounting system as the PMW-F3. The FZ lens mount mount with it’s very shallow flange back makes it so easy to adapt to other lens mounts. The cameras will be supplied with a PL mount adapter and third party adapters are already available for everything from Canon and Nikon DSLR lenses through to B4 2/3″ broadcast lenses. The sensors are full size Super 35mm sensors, no odd sizes here so no problems finding lenses to fit. If you don’t need or want raw recording and the very large file sizes that come hand in hand with raw then you have lots of options. For a start the raw recorder the ASX-R5 is optional.

Sony ASX-R5 raw recorder.

It docks to either camera via a clever quick release mechanism. When mounted it appears to be part of the camera and works seamlessly with the camera. As it is a separate recorder it brings the possibility of dual mode recording, shooting in both 16 bit raw and compressed video simultaneously. If you don’t need raw then you can shoot with a wide range of modes and codecs.

Internally both the F5 and F55 can record 8 bit XDCAM HD 422 at 50Mb/s. This would be the ideal proxy format for those shooting in raw. If you need better quality then there is the new XAVC codec, which is based on AVCHD (level 5.2 of H.264/MPEG-4 AVC) and is highly expandable. It will allow for HD,2K and 4k compressed recording at up to 60p and Sony are inviting 3rd parties to help develop applications that make use of the codec. The F5 will record XAVC at up to 2K and the F55 will record compressed 4k. If that isn’t enough then both cameras will also be able to record using the HDCAM SR codec,  SStP. To cope with all this data Sony are also introducing a new SxS card. The SxS Pro+ cards are plenty fast enough to deal with recording 4k compressed. Standard SxS cards can be used for XDCAM.

If all that isn’t enough these cameras can shoot at high speeds. The F5 will go up to 120fps and the F55 up to 240fps both compressed and raw, although shooting raw at 120fps or 240fps raw will generate scary amounts of data. Unlike the FS700 your not limited to short bursts, these cameras can roll continuously at the high frame rates, provide you have sufficient space on your SxS Pro+ or ASXM media cards.

When shooting compressed you have a choice of using conventional gammas and Hypergammas and there will be 6 Hypergammas on the F5/F55 (HG1, HG2, HG3, HG4, HG7 and HG8). For even greater dynamic range you have the option to use S-Log2. S-Log2 is similar to Sony’s original S-Log but extends the dynamic range to 14 stops. The beauty of the S-Log2 workflow will be the ability to capture the sensors full dynamic range but without the need to do all the time consuming file and data processing needed with raw.

The big question that still remains with these cameras and the ASX-R5 recorder (which will also work with the FS700 via the $2k HXR-IFR5 adapter) is what will the costs be?

My guess and this is a guess, given that the F3 will continue to be a current model is that the PMW-F5 will be in the region of $18k – $24k for the body only. The F55 with it’s extra features and global shutter $32k to $40k. I guess the ASX-R5 will be around $8k – $10k and the DVF-L350 about $3k-$4k.

Now, given my pricing estimates, what do I think? Well I hope they are cheaper, but I’m not sure that they will be as they need to be priced above the F3 and the F55 needs to be expensive enough to keep the F65 as a viable 4k proposition. But the flexibility that these cameras offer is truly incredible. If you are a news shooter you can stick a 2/3″ B4 lens without an optical adapter, flip in the 2x extender, shoot in compressed 4k on the F55 and then extract an HD image by cropping in to the center of the frame. You would have deep DoF so focus would not be as critical as when using the full super 35mm sensor. Shooting a documentary, then you can shoot compressed, shooting a movie then shoot 4k raw. The very thought of 16 bit raw with 14 stops of dynamic range is making me drool, these cameras will seriously encroach on F65 territory and give the Arri Alexa a very hard time indeed, heck even the F5 will give the Alexa a very hard time. A clear sign of just how significant these cameras are is the way Red have slashed the prices of their Epic and Scarlet cameras. It really is a great time to be a film maker, the tools available now are incredible and the prices equally amazing. If nothing else, if I find my price guess is way off and the F5 unaffordable, they have put a fully configured Scarlet in my price range! So to answer my initial question, yes I think these are game changers. They have a large element of future proofing. They will work now as high quality compressed HD/2K cameras, add the R5 and you have 16 bit 4k linear raw. Shoulder mount, handheld, 3D these cameras can do it all.

14 thoughts on “Are the F5 and F55 going to be game-changers?”

  1. Hi,
    as many others i’m quite thrilled with these cameras. i hope the prices will be as low as e belgian vendor states on their website (15.000.-euros net for f5 and about 19.000net the f55) if so, these will fly off the shelves.
    i too hope that they will have a “legacy” program, offering a trade in for f3 owners. in their chat it was mentioned that they’re thinking about it… we’ll see with what they’ll come up with, but as the price for a used F3 is around 6.500euros…

    are they future proof? well, what is these days… my wonderful F3 is outdated after 1 1/2 years, my friends c300 after 1 year. will 4k be enough? i highly doubt it, for the difference from 2k to 4k is not a big leap as it was from SD to HD. so 8k is lurking around the corner…
    if the difference between f5 and f55 is only 5000 euros then this is a no brainer for the f55.
    if the prices are higher, and the f55 is more than 30.000.- then i will not switch from my F3. If there’ll be a trade in, and i could grab a “naked” f55 for say 13.000.-euros i’d be highly highly tempted 😉
    on the other hand, a red one mx for 4.000.-dollars is with all its flaws simply a great deal. but wait – what was the price for it 3 years ago? or even better, what was the Epic price 2 weeks ago?
    it’s such a fast pace all of our cameras get outdated…
    (but yes, i love my F3 and my clients are still stunned when they see Slog Prores files from difficult lighting situations…and so am i ;-))

    1. I don’t think 8k is lurking around the corner. To be honest I don’t think we will see mainstream 4k broadcasting for at least another 4 years. The benefit of shooting 4k for most people will be the ability to crop into the 4k image for 2k and HD delivery. There is already a shortage of bandwidth for broadcasting and 4K will find a hard time getting the bandwidth it needs. The majority of Cinemas only have 2k projectors and most feature films are finished at 2k. It has been possible to project and finish in 4k for several years, yet still the cinemas choose to stick with 2k. If they can’t be persuaded to go to 4k where will the impetus for 8k come from. The reality is that in real world viewing the average paying viewer either can’t see the difference or doesn’t really care.

      The F5/F55 do not make the F3, C300 etc out of date. The F3 is still a very capable camera and still produces images that meet or exceed the requirements needed for many productions, especially if used with S-log and an external recorder. The F5/F55 might be the new fashion items, but they do not make the F3, C300 etc obsolete or out of date. The F5/F55 is significantly heavier and more power hungry than the F3 and not as well suited to handheld shooting.

      1. Hi Alister,
        i’m a true believer in content is king vs resolution/camera etc.
        but i also think that we are right in the middle of a paradigm shift. i think that traditional broadcast is on the verge of decline. the internet will be the transmission of the future. and this means that there will be no broadcast limitations. Look at platforms like Vimeo. No better place to position your Independent Flick nowadays once they start their pay per view model later this year, or beginning of next year….
        it is my belief that platforms like the BBC iPlayer (which i love – i get to see BBC shows i otherwise couldn’t get here in austria…) will spark others such as HBO, ABC etc to rethink their licensing models. i’m pretty sure that they would make a decent amount of cash if they made all their shows available online via a paid app – even if in native english only prior to distribution by local TV Stations…(look at NFL Game Pass which is a huge success…) yes, the shows are 720p, but once the internet is the medium of choice by many people we’ll see a jump in resolution. (though DR and Tonality are way more important – something i’m terribly reminded of when i get footage from a specific camera brand for editing…)

        Anyway, yes, my F3 is not obsolete in a traditional sense. But as the new F’s amend all the little quirks and shortcomings the F3 has does make it outdated a little bit, no?

        if on the other hand Sony manages/decide to squeeze 100fps out of the F3 ’til the prerecord Buffer is full – a cache record system much like the fs700 – i wouldn’t bother buying into the new F’s…. would be a killer feature, probably technically possible, and prolong the lifespan in Sony’s portfolio 😉

  2. I’ve been slammed in the forums for saying this but BMCC is not even a contender within super35mm space. If you like 2x crop factor or micro 4/3rds’ sure perhaps it can be for you – but when you’re talking $20-$50k cameras I think your really talking to those who sport cine or near-cine 35mm lenses.

    As for changing any games – the F5 is the camera every F3 owner wishes they had – not because of 4k but moreso because of the frankenstein’d F3 rigs they’ve been forced to put together with EVF, ext. recorder and ext. power. The F5 will make all of that go away plus offer 2k internal recording and a 4k RAW option which ought to keep the noise level down for those who will ask about it.

    The F55 on the other hand is interesting but will ask its buyers to invest into Sony’s proprietary codecs. Everywhere I turn at least anyone dealing in 4k is speaking RAW or 3rd party codecs. The F55 will force people into XAVC for 2k/4k and not sure how much people will like that and fork over the cash for it. Time will tell. For myself at least if I’m going to shoot 4k professionally I will want codec options which means an external 4k recorder anyway.

    Cinema is one thing – but remember in the end that s35 isn’t the be all end-all of formats for broadcast so it wouldn’t surprise me to see some folks switching back to 2/3″ 4k as more of those cameras start to become available. They would also likely be far better priced then s35 cams which for a long time you could only be had for a mere +$100k.

    1. A 4K 2/3″ sensor will be very noisy and poor in low light compared to a camera with a S35 sized sensor due to the very small pixel size. Your potentially looking at the noise and grain levels you currently see on 1/4 and 1/3″ cameras. That’s just not going to cut it for 4k. The whole point of 4k is large screen display and noise on a big screen is highly objectionable.

      XAVC is an open codec. It is a Sony codec but anyone can apply for a licence to develop products and software that uses XAVC. How open it will actually end up being, I don’t know. But the issue is that there are very few codecs around that can currently scale from HD to 4k and cope with 60 fps plus. Even fewer that can do it at sensible bit rates without requiring excessive CPU cycles to decode. A new codec was needed as there was nothing else around that would do what Sony want. Of course raw is possible with either camera via the R5 if that’s whats really wanted.

      The BMCC camera, while it does not have the same shallow DoF of a super 35mm camera it does have a shallower DoF than most conventional cameras and if you use f0.95 lenses you can get a near 35mm look. Most Hollywood movies don’t have the super shallow DoF that is fashionable on the web anyway. If they did, on the big screen it end up excessively shallow. So I do believe it is right to include the BMCC.

    1. The sensor size and pixel count matches that of the FS700’s sensor. It’s not entirely clear what the pattern on the F5 is, but is most likely bayer. The F55 is said to use the same pattern as the F65 which is Q67.

  3. “The F5/F55 is significantly heavier and more power hungry than the F3 and not as well suited to handheld shooting.”
    I found the F3 to be one of the most awkward hand held cameras I have ever used–second to only the Eclair NPR.
    Looks to me like the F5-F55 with an honest to god real viewfinder, a factory shoulder pad, and a low center of gravity coupled with the Fujinon Cabrio would be a hand held shooter’s dream machine….

    1. The F5/F55 will be very difficult to hand-hold, on the shoulder they will be excellent. The F3 is hard to configure for shoulder mounting (although it can be done well with the right parts) but easier to hand hold.

  4. Would it be correct to say that when recording HD (or 2K) with these cameras, the full 4K resolution is sampled and debayered, and then interpolated down to HD, (supersampling)? If so, colouring artefacts or moiré would then be held at a minimum?

    Are the different gamma selections disabled when shooting RAW ?

    1. Yes, the sensors will be read at 4k whether shooting HD, 2k or 4k at frame rates up to 60fps. Above 60fps there may be some differences.

  5. How will a 2/3 inch lens work with these camera,s.. ? I thought the back element was too small..

    Both camera,s good great.. esp if F5 is around the $15,000 mark-ish.. after all the flax they took for the non 50 mbps F3.. they have really came up with the goods..

    Totally agree with the previous poster.. everytime I saw a pic of an F3 looking like a Xmas tree.. the more I didnt want one.. imagine having to have a separate battery for your VF !! but now the F5.. prayers answered..

    Thanks Sony !

  6. Very nice article, Alister. Hope you get a sneak peek at the new cams and an opportunity to test drive them for us.

    Sure would be nice if Sony offered a loyalty trade-in program for us F3 owners. That would be an unusual move for Sony so I don’t see it happening.
    The F5 looks like the camera for me since I do broadcast and corporate clients. The cool thing is I can accommodate those customers without the expense of the optional recorder…just add VF and shoulder pad and I’m good to go. That’s a far cry from the months of scouring the web and the several thousands of dollars spent modifying the F3 into something usable. Oh well…hope the pricing is right.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.