Well the rumours have been circulating for some time and prototypes have been seen at various trade shows, but the full details have been sparse to say the least. Well here it is, it’s called the FS-100 and it’s a quite radical design from the Sony Shinegawa factory. The Super 35mm NXCAM shares the same sensor as the new PMW-F3, so the images will be excellent, but the design of the camera body itself could not be more different. If you don’t like it… well you can blame me and several other DoP’s that were invited to attend brainstorming sessions with the Sony engineers. In the photo below you can see the white board from one of those sessions and you can see where we (me and the other DoP’s) discussed ideas like a modular design with removable handles and how we hold handycam cameras.
The end result is this rather quirky but in my opinion, really quite clever and versatile design. The top viewfinder allows you to use the camera cradled in your hands in front of you, either using just the LCD panel or the monocular viewfinder. When your doing interviews you can twist it so that it is visible from either side of the camera, excellent for those interviews where you are both camera operator and interviewer. It allows you to alternate the sight lines from left to right of the camera for more varied interviews. It’s also useful for shooting in cramped locations such as in the front of a car as you can hold the camera sideways in front of you to shoot… I mean film…. the driver and still see what your getting.
Unlike most traditional camcorders the camera can be stripped down to just the sensor/recorder body. You can remove the top handle, mic holder and hand grip. In addition it has a multitude of tripod mounting holes on the top, bottom and even one side. On the base of the camera there are 6x 1/4″ threaded holes and wait for it… 2x 3/8″ holes. Hooray!! On the top there are a further 3x 1/4″ holes and there is even one on the side, revealed when you detach the removable hand grip. This is going to be fantastic for use on cars as a 35mm minicam or crash-cam. It will make getting all those different car chase angles so easy as a few small suction mounts will allow you to mount the stripped down camera just about anywhere. I can see the FS-100 becoming a “must-have” B camera to compliment my F3. The 1/4″ thread on the side of the camera means you can mount it on it’s side for portrait style shooting for digital signage or to get the maximum resolution when shooting people for chroma key.
While the camera does come with a detachable handgrip, there is no zoom rocker like the F3. That’s because the camera is primarily aimed at those using DSLR lenses which don’t have servo zooms, although PL mount adapters are available. The front end of the camera has Sony’s E mount for interchangeable lenses. It will come with the rather nice (if a little slow) 18-200mm f3.5-f6.3 optically stabilised zoom lens and the auto focus and auto iris do work! As well as Sony’s own G series lenses for the NEX cameras you can get adapters for Sony A mount and most other lenses. Do consider that if you are planning on using heavy PL lenses that the E mount is not designed for such high loads, so an additional lens support system should be used.
On the input and output front the FS-100 has most of the connectors you would expect to find on an NXCAM camcorder, with one notable exception… HDSDi. There is no HDSDi, but don’t panic! The camera does have HDMI and the quality available from HDMI is every bit as good as HDSDi. No word as to whether it’s 8 bit or 10 bit though. Sony are well aware that the one thing missing from HDMI is normally timecode, but even that has been addressed and it will be possible to export timecode in the HDMI stream, although at the moment we need to wait for the HDMI recorders to update them to accept timecode via HDMI. There are 2 XLR connectors for audio in. One on the right side and one on the rear, there is also the usual mini-D component out and RCA/Phono audio and composite video outputs.
When you start to delve into the cameras frame rates and recording modes things get really interesting as the FS100 will record full 1920×1080 at 60P and 50P. Even the F3 can’t do this internally (you can output 50/60P to an external recorder). As well as all the usual frame rates like 23.98, 60/50i, 30/25P you can also shoot full resolution slo-mo at up to 60fps using S&Q motion. It’s not quite as flexible as the F3 as you will find that you only have a choice of frame rates (for example 1,2,3,6,12,25,50fps) and won’t have the ability to dial in any frame rate you want, but all frame rates will be full 1920×1080. As with the other NXCAM camcorders all these lovely modes will be recorded on to SD cards or Memory Sticks using the AVC HD codec (mpeg 4), in addition you can add the Sony FMU128 (128Gb Flash Memory Unit) for dual recording giving peace of mind with one off events.
Once your footage is on your cards the cleverness of this camera continues as you don’t need a laptop to backup your data. Simply plug in a USB drive or even a Blu-ray burner), direct to the cameras USB port and you can backup direct from the camera to the drive. Your footage will contain GPS data about when and where you shot it, which for me will be a great bonus with my severe weather footage as I can never remember exactly where I was during a storm chase!
All in all this is looking like one hell of a camcorder. The street price is estimated to be below $6000 USD, so you do have to ask the question.. why buy an F3 when this is half the price? In my view they are two quite different cameras for different applications. The F3 has the ability to output full 10 bit 4:4:4 for extremely high quality recording possibilities. It also has built in ND filters and will have S-Log and 3D dual camera control. For multi-camera shoots the F3 has Genlock and timecode in/out. There will also be some nice servo zooms for the F3 some time later this year or early next year. The F3 is a camera that would not at all be out of place as a B camera on a big budget production. The FS-100 will I’m sure also find a place on big budget productions, perhaps as a crash-cam or mini cam. But overall I think it will be most at home on more run and gun style shoots where auto iris and maybe even autofocus are beneficial. I really do think that the FS100 will replace many of the DSLR’s out there currently being used for video as a lot of thought has gone in to the ergonomics.
These are very interesting times. It’s now possible to shoot a movie, with quality good enough for mainstream theatrical release on cameras costing little more than a high end home video camcorder of just a few years ago. I doubt most cinema goers would realise that a camera like the F3 or FS100 was used, especially if it’s recorded to a NanoFlash, KiPro or even the new Convergent Design Gemini. However we must not forget that content is king, not the technology that makes it possible.
I have an F3 on back order and am not quite sure when it will show up. I thought maybe this FS-100 will serve me well if I can get it to use before the F3 shows. Do you know when it will be available? Also, how will it integrate with my 350 and EX 1 and 3s and F3. I do a lot of live classical music events and the audio section counts. How is it compared to a good external audio recorder. My son, Harry, wants to know if there is any video improvement over the EX-1 – we figure the audio has to be better than the very mediocre audio section fo the EXs.
The FS-100 is expected to ship around July/August, so your F3 should turn up well before then. The images are similar to the F3 but not exactly the same. We need to wait for a production unit to see just what the differences really are. I doubt there is a big audio improvement of the EX, but I find that if the levels are set correctly the EX audio is quite acceptable for a camcorder.
I have an F3 on back order and am not quite sure when it will show up. I thought maybe this FS-100 will serve me well if I can get it to use before the F3 shows. Do you know when it will be available? Also, how will it integrate with my 350 and EX 1 and 3s and F3. I do a lot of live classical music events and the audio section counts. How is it compared to a good external audio recorder. My son, Harry, wants to know if there is any video improvement over the EX-1 – we figure the audio has to be better than the very mediocre audio section fo the EXs.
The FS-100 is expected to ship around July/August, so your F3 should turn up well before then. The images are similar to the F3 but not exactly the same. We need to wait for a production unit to see just what the differences really are. I doubt there is a big audio improvement of the EX, but I find that if the levels are set correctly the EX audio is quite acceptable for a camcorder.
Alister,
Exciting camera, though I will miss 10-bit HD-SDI output. I have a question: If you shoot, using an external recording device, to the same codec, at the same bitrate, and using the same lenses, gamma settings, and picture profiles, etc, in both cameras, F3 and FS-100 (say, you record 8-bit ProRes at 100 mbps in both), can we expect the images to be exactly the same quality? Or does it occur that because the internal electronic processing of the F3 is still different from the one on the FS-100, the image quality that comes from both will still differ?
The processing is different so there is likely to be a small difference, but until we see a production unit I don’t know how big or small the difference will be.
Alister,
Exciting camera, though I will miss 10-bit HD-SDI output. I have a question: If you shoot, using an external recording device, to the same codec, at the same bitrate, and using the same lenses, gamma settings, and picture profiles, etc, in both cameras, F3 and FS-100 (say, you record 8-bit ProRes at 100 mbps in both), can we expect the images to be exactly the same quality? Or does it occur that because the internal electronic processing of the F3 is still different from the one on the FS-100, the image quality that comes from both will still differ?
The processing is different so there is likely to be a small difference, but until we see a production unit I don’t know how big or small the difference will be.
Alister for whatever technical reasons, small flange back etc. How practical is the FS100 using a Nikon 50mm f1.4 lens for SDoF when you have no ND filter.
So what do people use matte boxes for then? Every vDSLR I’ve seen used for a “pro” shoot has had a matte box, rails and all the other fancy dress added to it, including matte boxes and I see no reason why owners of FS100 won’t do the same. Screw on ND’s are another option as are vari ND’s or ND faders, simple cokin filter holders etc etc, there’s lots of options, pick the one that fits your needs.
Alister for whatever technical reasons, small flange back etc. How practical is the FS100 using a Nikon 50mm f1.4 lens for SDoF when you have no ND filter.
So what do people use matte boxes for then? Every vDSLR I’ve seen used for a “pro” shoot has had a matte box, rails and all the other fancy dress added to it, including matte boxes and I see no reason why owners of FS100 won’t do the same. Screw on ND’s are another option as are vari ND’s or ND faders, simple cokin filter holders etc etc, there’s lots of options, pick the one that fits your needs.
In other words if you but an FS100 you are forced to buy and expensive Matte box plus ND filters or buy vari ND filters for every lens you buy.
I personally think its a bad omission and Sony could have designed the camera with a suitable mount to take the same ND filters as seen on the F3.
In other words if you but an FS100 you are forced to buy and expensive Matte box plus ND filters or buy vari ND filters for every lens you buy.
I personally think its a bad omission and Sony could have designed the camera with a suitable mount to take the same ND filters as seen on the F3.
Going back to your original example of a Canon lens, you will HAVE to use an ND fader or Vari ND because you have no iris control anyway and a pair of fixed ND’s as on the F3 is not going to give you the fine control over exposure that you need, that would be the same on an F3. All you need to do is buy a single ND fader that is big enough to cover your largest lens and then get the appropriate $4 step up or step down ring for each lens. Then leave the step rings on all your lenses so that every one of your lenses can use the same screw in filters, hoods or matte boxes etc. Most people will want to use an ND fader to allow them to open up their lenses as much as possible and to get around the click stop iris rings of DSLR lenses, fixed ND’s just won’t do that. To add the ND filters behind the lens would have made the camera body considerably larger and probably have excluded the use of E-Mount lenses, remember that this is a bigger sensor than the AF101. You’ve made it very clear that you don’t like this camera and your perfectly entitled to that opinion, but I really don’t think you’ve thought through the possibilities that having a small and compact camera body open up. Possibilities that IMHO far outweigh the small inconvenience of having to add a low cost ND filter onto a lens. This is a low cost camera that has a really innovative design, if you want all the bells and whistles buy an F3. You do have a choice.
Going back to your original example of a Canon lens, you will HAVE to use an ND fader or Vari ND because you have no iris control anyway and a pair of fixed ND’s as on the F3 is not going to give you the fine control over exposure that you need, that would be the same on an F3. All you need to do is buy a single ND fader that is big enough to cover your largest lens and then get the appropriate $4 step up or step down ring for each lens. Then leave the step rings on all your lenses so that every one of your lenses can use the same screw in filters, hoods or matte boxes etc. Most people will want to use an ND fader to allow them to open up their lenses as much as possible and to get around the click stop iris rings of DSLR lenses, fixed ND’s just won’t do that. To add the ND filters behind the lens would have made the camera body considerably larger and probably have excluded the use of E-Mount lenses, remember that this is a bigger sensor than the AF101. You’ve made it very clear that you don’t like this camera and your perfectly entitled to that opinion, but I really don’t think you’ve thought through the possibilities that having a small and compact camera body open up. Possibilities that IMHO far outweigh the small inconvenience of having to add a low cost ND filter onto a lens. This is a low cost camera that has a really innovative design, if you want all the bells and whistles buy an F3. You do have a choice.